Executive Program in AI Governance · cohort from March 3 to April 14, 2027 · Founder batch until November 30, 2026 Learn about the program

EthikAI Institute · Independent AI governance verification

From policy to evidence.

We show what your organization can prove about the artificial intelligence it uses.

Independent verification of artificial intelligence governance, with methodological and scientific rigor. Diagnostics, training, and executive sessions in which every conclusion states the evidence that supports it.

EthikAI Institute

The EthikAI Institute

Cover with the phrase Sua política não protege sua empresa beside a portrait of Paola Cantarini Guerra.

Presentation featuring a digital avatar generated by AI from Paola Cantarini Guerra's image and voice.

15 and 20 business days
deadlines defined for the diagnostics
Fixed price
fixed scope and value, informed in the proposal
No conflict of interest
does not develop or sell AI and does not evaluate what it writes
3 levels
of evidence stated in each conclusion

If tomorrow the board, a regulator, or a judge asks how your organization governs AI, what can it show?

AI systems already take part in decisions about people in credit, selection, customer service, health, education, security, and the administration of justice. It is no longer enough to state that the organization has principles, committees, or policies; it is necessary to demonstrate that controls exist, that they work, and that someone is accountable for them. Between what is declared and what can be proven opens up the space of cosmetic compliance, in which documents replace controls and the formal presence of a human reviewer stands in for supervision. It is in this space that the Institute works.

98% · 47%

of the senior AI executives surveyed at US public companies with revenue above US$ 1 billion say they have a formal AI governance policy; 47% say the organization has already failed to apply it in urgent deployments (EY, September 2026)

92%

of organizations that suffered AI-related incidents did not have adequate access controls for their AI systems (IBM and Ponemon Institute, 2026)

10.94%

of non-conformity in automatic denials by the INSS, and 13.20% in manual ones: the harm does not arise from regulation, but from the absence of documentation and demonstrable controls (Federal Court of Accounts, Ruling 634/2025) See the source (TCU)

Portrait of Paola Cantarini Guerra wearing glasses, in front of a bookshelf.

WHO LEADS

Paola Cantarini Guerra

Founder and president of Instituto EthikAI

A legal scholar and philosopher with three doctorates, in Law and Philosophy (PUC-SP) and in Philosophy of Law (Università del Salento), and ten postdoctoral programs. She coordinates the AI Governance Group of the Understanding AI project at the Institute of Advanced Studies of USP. In 2026, she is a guest researcher at the University of Oxford's Institute for Ethics in AI and the Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG) in Berlin, and a visiting researcher at Université Paris Cité. She personally leads and signs the Institute's work.

Discover her journey

Twenty minutes to find out what your organization can already prove.

Monthly newsletter

Quem verifica? no. 1 · November 2026

Human presence is not human control. What changed, what can be proven, and what to ask at the next meeting.